National Jury Trial Innovations Project
The primary purpose and goal of the National Jury Trial Innovations Project (NJTIP) is quite simple: To implement innovations that make the jury trial a better place to teach and learn.
The NJTIP remains alive and well and active throughout the United States. IADC members have presented programs in numerous locations, including Ohio, Alaska, Georgia, Kansas, Nevada, Vermont, New York, Maryland, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Missouri and California. The audiences that have been reached include such diverse groups as the National Association of Women Judges; The University of Kansas Law School; The American College of Trial Lawyers; The National Association of Independent Insurers; and the New York State Commissioners of Jurors.
Since 1998, more than 150 NJTIP programs have been presented by IADC members, to more than 10,000 attorneys, judges, law school students and business professionals. Feedback from every forum and the obvious benefits to the IADC have been overwhelmingly positive. The Project's team leaders and program presenters are not planning to rest on what has been accomplished to date but, instead, look forward to moving the NJTIP further into the forefront of jury trial innovations and change.
Federal Innovations
Federal JuryInnovations (PDF)
State Innovations
The National Jury Trial Innovations Project is committed to monitoring the progress of state jury trial innovations. To learn more about jury innovations that have been implemented in various states, click on the state links below.
If you are interested in becoming more involved in The National Jury Trial Innovations Project by contributing to the research involved in updating this site, please e-mail
foundation@iadclaw.org.
Alabama (PDF)
Alaska (PDF)
Arizona (PDF)
Arkansas (PDF)
California (PDF)
Colorado (PDF)
Connecticut (PDF)
Delaware (PDF)
Florida (PDF)
Georgia (PDF)
Hawaii (PDF)
Idaho (PDF)
Illinois (PDF)
Indiana (PDF)
Iowa (PDF)
Kansas (PDF)
Kentucky (PDF)
Louisiana (PDF)
Maine (PDF)
Maryland (PDF)
Massachusetts (PDF)
Michigan (PDF)
Minnesota (PDF)
Mississippi (PDF)
Missouri (PDF)
Montana (PDF)
Nebraska (PDF)
Nevada (PDF)
New Hampshire (PDF)
New Jersey (PDF)
New Mexico (PDF)
New York (PDF)
North Carolina (PDF)
North Dakota (PDF)
Ohio (PDF)
Oklahoma (PDF)
Oregon (PDF)
Pennsylvania (PDF)
Rhode Island (PDF)
South Carolina (PDF)
South Dakota (PDF)
Tennessee (PDF)
Texas (PDF)
Utah (PDF)
Vermont (PDF)
Virginia (PDF)
Washington (PDF)
West Virginia (PDF)
Wisconsin (PDF)
Wyoming (PDF)
International Innovations
Modular Program
Each program begins with an overview of the Project followed by a summary of how jurors make decisions and process information. There are then 33 possible innovations for discussion. Certain ones will be selected for a given programs, usually based on time allotment and topics of interest to the audience.
Introduction
- Speaker Introductions
- Background of Project
How Jurors Make Decisions
- The Current Process
- A Different Perspective: "Order in the Classroom" (video)
- What a Jury Trial Should Be
- How Jurors Make Decisions
- How Jurors Process Information
- Innovations
Setting the Framework
- Plain English at Trial
- Opening Statements to the Entire Jury Panel
- Lawyer-Conducted voir dire
- Pre-instructing the Jury
- Mini-Openings / Interim Commentary
- Jury Instructions Before Closing Arguments
- Plain English Jury Instruction
- Written or Recorded Instructions for Jurors
Jurors Should be Actively Involved
- Questionnaire to Assist Jury Selection
- Jurors' Questions to Witnesses
- Juror Discussions of Evidence During the Trial
- Juror Questions About Instructions
- Juror Note Taking
Enhancing the Decision Making Process
- Pretrial Limits on Each Party's Time at Trial
- Pretrial Admission of Exhibits and Deposition Testimony
- Computer Simulations and Reenactments
- Jury Tutorials
- Jury Notebooks
- Appointing Court Experts
- Reordering the Sequence of Expert Testimony
Improving a Juror's Frame of Mind
- One-Day / One-Trial Terms of Jury Service
- Non-Designation of Alternates and Jurors
- Permitting Alternates to Observe Deliberations
- Modifying Daily Schedules
- Suggestions for Jurors on Conducting Deliberations
- Scheduling Jury Deliberations
- Scheduling Verdict Announcements
- A Few More Ideas:
- Orientation Video
- Jury Orientation via Cable Television
- How to Relieve Jury Boredom
- Place Cards or Seating Charts
Insights for Jurors, Lawyers, and Judges
- Advice Regarding Post-Verdict Conversations
- Informal Meetings Between the Judge and Jury
- Post-Verdict Interviews by Attorneys and Researchers
- Juror Exit Questionnaires
- Debriefing Sessions to Alleviate Juror Stress
How to Improve the Civil Justice System
- Innovations in Progress
- How to Begin
- Cite Authority
- Experimentation
- Sharing Successes
- Conclusion
Organize a Program
More than 10,000 attorneys, judges, law school students and business professionals have attended programs of the Foundation's National Jury Trial Innovations Project. Team leaders are moving the program into the forefront of jury trial innovations and change.
If you would like to organize a program, please contact the IADC headquarters in Chicago at 312.368.1494 or e-mail
foundation@iadclaw.org. The office will mail you a packet that includes suggested local contacts, listing of current team leaders, listing of past presenters, ideas on speaker guidelines and formats, attendee evaluation forms, the NJTIP PowerPoint presentation and modular program summary, and the entertaining DVD, "Order in the Classroom."
Thank you for your interest and support of this important project of the IADC Foundation.
Links
Practitioner Survey
Joint Survey Project with NCSC
The National Jury Trial Innovations Project of the IADC Foundation is working with the National Center for State Courts to document jury trial procedures in jurisdictions around the U.S. Ultimately, we hope to post the results of this and other surveys on the IADC website to allow viewers to access information on the jury trial innovations that have been adopted in the various courts. Please take a few minutes to complete the Practitioner Survey below, and return it to the IADC.
________________________________________
The survey is available to download in two formats, PDF and Microsoft Word. If you do not yet have Acrobat Reader to view PDF files, you can download it for FREE from:
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html.
1) The PDF document should be downloaded, printed, filled out, and then faxed or mailed back to the IADC office.
Practitioner Survey (PDF)
2) The Microsoft Word document should be downloaded, filled out, saved, and then emailed back to the IADC office.
Practitioner Survey (MS Word)
________________________________________
Please send your completed questionnaire to the IADC office:
IADC - Attn: NJTIP
One North Franklin
Suite 1205
Chicago, IL 60606
Fax: 312.368.1854
E-mail:
foundation@iadclaw.org
Publications and Materials
Order In The Classroom DVD
What if a college course were taught using the procedures and rules of a jury trial? That is the premise of "Order in the Classroom," a satirical yet insightful DVD that has gained national attention as a vivid portrayal of the problems inherent in the jury trial system.
The video is part of a program on jury trial innovations being given throughout the U.S. by IADC members and teams of judges and attorneys form the defense and plaintiff bars. It is an excellent way to start discussions and introduce information on the topic of jury trial innovations. DVD length: 3 min. 28 sec.
Cost: $40
Order -
link to new shopping cart module
Jury Trial Innovations
Jury Trial Innovations brings you up-to-date on the most recent techniques and ideas for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of jury trials. This monograph, which takes its organization from the stages of a typical jury trial, discusses the dynamics of jury decision making and reviews jury trial innovations used in state and federal courts across the country. Topics include "How to Relieve Juror Boredom," "Routine Use of Anonymous Juries," "Juror Questions to Witnesses," and "Post-verdict Debriefings with the Trial Judge." This is a joint publication of The National Center for State Courts and the American Bar Association’s Section of Litigation, with funding from the State Justice Institute.
Cost: $18
Order –
link to new shopping cart module
Team Leaders
( Listed Alphabetically By State )
Alabama
Walter T. Gilmer, Jr.
wgilmer@mcdowellknight.com
William C. Wood
wood@nwkt.com
Alaska
John B. Thorsness
jthorsness@cpsattorneys.com
Clay A. Young
cay@delaneywiles.com
Arizona
F. Michael Carroll
mcarroll@bcattorneys.com
George H. Mitchell
gmitchell@cavanaghlaw.com
Arkansas
James Phillip Malcom
malcom@fec.net
Lucinda McDaniel
lucinda@wlpmm-firm.com
California
Jeffrey J. Christovich
christovich@lbbslaw.com
Kevin J. Dunne
kevin.dunne@sdma.com
Jack B. McCowan, Jr.
jmccowan@gordonrees.com
Regina A. Petty
rpetty@wpkt.com
Gregory C. Read
gregory.read@sdma.com
Archie Stirling Robinson
asr@r-winc.com
Timothy L. Walker
walker@fwhb.com
Colorado
Cathy Havener Greer
cgreer@warllc.com
Mary A. Wells
mwells@warllc.com
Connecticut
William R. Moller None listed
Eric Watt Wiechmann
ewiechmann@mccarter.com
DC, Washington
James A. Hourihan
jahourihan@hhlaw.com
Florida
Mercer K. Clarke
bclarke@cswm.com
Richard M. Dunn
rmdunn@shb.com
Edward R. Nicklaus
edwardn@nicklauslaw.com
Georgia
Lori G. Cohen
lcohen@alston.com
Clayton H. Farnham
cfarnham@deflaw.com
Andrew J. Hill, III
ajh@bbgbalaw.com
Albert H. Parnell
alby840@aol.com
Ronald D. Reemsnyder
rdr@welchspell.com
Idaho
J. Walter Sinclair
jwsinclair@stoel.com
Illinois
William J. Brinkmann
wjbrinkm@tmh-law.com
Daniel K. Cray
dkc@iwancray.com
Rex K. Linder
rlinder@hrva.com
Michael A. Pope
mpope@mwe.com
Jay H. Tressler
jtressler@mail.tsmp.com
Indiana
Larry G. Evans
levans@hwelaw.com
Randall R. Riggs
rriggs@locke.com
Ronald J. Waicukauski
rwaicukauski@price-law.com
Iowa
Gregory M. Lederer
glederer@simmonsperrine.com
John D. Mayne
jmayne@maynelaw.com
Kansas
Donald Patterson
dpatterson@fisherpatterson.com
Anthony F. Rupp
trupp@stklaw.com
Larry B. Spikes
lbspikes@spikeslaw.com
Randy J. Troutt
troutt@hitefanning.com
Louisiana
John S. Bradford
jsbradford@ssvcs.com
Terry Christovich Gay
tcgay@christovich.com
Gary G. Hebert
ghebert@mcglinchey.com
Edward J. Rice, Jr.
edward.rice@arlaw.com
Emmett C. Sole
ecsole@ssvcs.com
Quentin F. Urquhart, Jr.
qurquhart@irwinllc.com
Maine
Harold J. Friedman
hfriedman@fgwl-law.com
Maryland
Donald L. DeVries, Jr.
dld@gdldlaw.com
Bruce R. Parker
brparker@venable.com
Rudolph L. Rose
rrose@semmes.com
Richard W. Scheiner
rscheiner@semmes.com
Massachusetts
Brian P. Voke
bvoke@campbell-trial-lawyers.com
Rebecca J. Wilson
rwilson@peabodyarnold.com
Michigan
William D. Booth
wbooth@plunkettcooney.com
Minnesota
Tina M. Traficanti
tmtraficanti@rkmc.com
Mississippi
Harry R. Allen
hallen@avchlaw.com
Christy D. Jones
christy.jones@butlersnow.com
Landman Teller, Jr.
lteller@tellerlaw.com
Missouri
John W. Cowden
cowden@bscr-law.com
Lawrence B. Grebel
lgrebel@bjpc.com
Harvey L. Kaplan
hkaplan@shb.com
Patrick Lysaught
lysaught@bscr-law.com
Daniel T. Rabbitt
rabbitt@rabbittlaw.com
Montana
Michael J. Milodragovich
bigskylaw@montana.com
Nebraska
Walter E. Zink, II
wzink@baylorlaw.com
New Jersey
Brian C. Harris
Bcharris@bhs-law.com
New York
Judith A. Aydelott
jaaydelott@aol.com
Desmond T. Barry, Jr.
dbarry@condonlaw.com
George W. Collins, Jr.
gcollins@bouvierlaw.com
Mark Gregory Farrell
judgefarrell@aol.com
George S. Hodges
ghodges@bghc-law.com
Michael J. Holland
mholland@condonlaw.com
Harry F. Mooney
hfm@hurwitzfine.com
Susan C. Roney
sroney@nixonpeabody.com
North Carolina
Kirk G. Warner
kwarner@smithlaw.com
Ohio
Henry A. Hentemann
pcooper@davisyoung.com
Ronald H. Isroff
risroff@ulmer.com
James L. McCrystal, Jr.
mccrystal@bqmlaw.com
William G. Porter, II
wgporter@vssp.com
Joseph W. Ryan, Jr.
jryan@porterwright.com
Ralph Streza
rstreza@porterwright.com
David H. Wallace
dwallace@taftlaw.com
Oklahoma
A. Thomas Elder, Jr.
telder@chubbucksmith.com
Larry D. Ottaway
larryottaway@oklahomacounsel.com
Ontario, Canada
Lee Samis
leesamis@samislaw.com
Oregon
William B. Crow
bcrow@schwabe.com
Thomas A. Gordon
tgordon@gordon-polscer.com
Douglas G. Houser
doug.houser@bullivant.com
Pennsylvania
Debra S. Dunne
ddunne@smsm.com
Ann Thornton Field
afield@cozen.com
Reeder R. Fox
fox@duanemorris.com
Thomas P. Grace
tgrace@bodellbove.com
Paul M. Hummer
phummer@saul.com
George J. Murphy
gmurphy@heckerbrown.com
Joseph E. O'Neil
jeo@lavin-law.com
David J. Rosenberg
drosenberg@wglaw.com
James G. Rosenberg
jrosenberg@saul.com
South Carolina
William C. Cleveland, III
wcleveland@bmsmlaw.com
David E. Dukes
david.dukes@nelsonmullins.com
Tennessee
James M. Doran, Jr.
jdoran@wallerlaw.com
J. Kimbrough Johnson
johnsonk@thomasonlaw.com
Texas
David J. Beck
dbeck@brsfirm.com
Michael Connelly
mconnelly@connellybaker.com
Thad T. Dameris
tdameris@pillsburywinthrop.com
Otway B. Denny, Jr.
odenny@fulbright.com
Allan K. DuBois
akd@greendubois.com
Donald H. Flanary, Jr.
dflanary@flanarycarter.com
Barbara Radnofsky
bradnofsky@velaw.com
Joe W. Redden, Jr.
jredden@brsfirm.com
Rebecca Jo Reser
jreser@davidsontroilo.com
Joseph F. Speelman
joseph.speelman@lyondell.com
Kenneth Tekell
kvirgadamo@tbml.com
Utah
Ray R. Christensen
ray.christensen@chrisjen.com
Vermont
Robert R. McKearin
rmckearin@dinse.com
Virginia
Glen A. Huff
ghuff@hpmlaw.com
James Watson Morris, III
jmorris@morrismorris.com
Washington
Christopher W. Tompkins
ctompkins@bpmlaw.com
Wisconsin
Edward A. Hannan
ehannan@hannanlegal.com
Timothy J. Muldowney
tmuldowney@gklaw.com